Details

    • Type: Modify Token Modify Token
    • Status: Proposed Proposed
    • Priority: Minor Minor
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: Data Team Wishlist #2, 6.01.03
    • Component/s: LST Tag
    • Labels:
      None
    • Dependent Data:
      MSRD
    • Subtype:
      None Taken

      Description

      CHOOSE:ABILITYSELECTION|w|x

      Variables Used (w): Text (Category defined)
      Variables Used (x): Text (Ability Name)

      NOTE:This would duplicate the existing behavior we have in CHOOSE:FEATSELECTION(Example is Weapon
      Specialization)

      Example:
      CHOOSE:ABILITYSELECTION|FEAT|Weapon Focus

      • Would return any values weapon focus had taken

      NOTE for docs: This tag has the same options as CHOOSE:FEATSELECTION with the addition of the 'w' category parameter as shown above.

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          Eric C. Smith
          added a comment -

          Working on this one right now. Is it a good assumption that the syntax is identical to CHOOSE:FEATSELECTION? Only for abilities?

          Show
          Eric C. Smith
          added a comment - Working on this one right now. Is it a good assumption that the syntax is identical to CHOOSE:FEATSELECTION? Only for abilities?
          Hide
          Eric C. Smith
          added a comment -

          What is the status of this tag? Is it working as FEATSELECTION does or not?

          Show
          Eric C. Smith
          added a comment - What is the status of this tag? Is it working as FEATSELECTION does or not?
          Hide
          James Dempsey
          added a comment -

          I think this one needs to be revisited - it will likely need some changes and should not be documented currently.

          Show
          James Dempsey
          added a comment - I think this one needs to be revisited - it will likely need some changes and should not be documented currently.
          Hide
          Eric C. Smith
          added a comment -

          It has been in the docs for some time but commented out as well as annotated as to why its commented out. I will leave it that way until we're ready.

          Show
          Eric C. Smith
          added a comment - It has been in the docs for some time but commented out as well as annotated as to why its commented out. I will leave it that way until we're ready.
          Hide
          Tom Parker
          added a comment -

          I believe the main problem is that it is unusable. Basically to use an AbilitySelection, you need a token like ABILITY that can take %LIST. Since we don't have one, this doesn't work currently in a way that has sufficient function to what the data team desires.

          Show
          Tom Parker
          added a comment - I believe the main problem is that it is unusable. Basically to use an AbilitySelection, you need a token like ABILITY that can take %LIST. Since we don't have one, this doesn't work currently in a way that has sufficient function to what the data team desires.

            People

            • Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              Andrew Maitland
            • Votes:
              1 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated: